Current:Home > Contact-usJack Daniel's v. poop-themed dog toy in a trademark case at the Supreme Court-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Jack Daniel's v. poop-themed dog toy in a trademark case at the Supreme Court
View Date:2024-12-23 18:46:16
The U.S. Supreme Court devoted spent more than an hour and a half on Wednesday chewing on a trademark question that pits the iconic Jack Daniel's trademark against a chewy dog toy company that is making money by lampooning the whiskey.
Ultimately the case centers on.....well, dog poop.
Lisa Blatt, the Jack Daniel's lawyer, got right to the point with her opening sentence. "This case involves a dog toy that copies Jack Daniel's trademark and trade dress and associates its whiskey with dog poop," she told the justices.
Indeed, Jack Daniel's is trying to stop the sale of that dog toy, contending that it infringes on its trademark, confuses consumers, and tarnishes its reputation. VIP, the company that manufactures and markets the dog toy, says it is not infringing on the trademark; it's spoofing it.
What the two sides argued
The toy looks like a vinyl version of a Jack Daniel's whiskey bottle, but the label is called Bad Spaniels, features a drawing of a spaniel on the chewy bottle, and instead of promising 40% alcohol by volume, instead promises "43% poo," and "100% smelly." VIP says no reasonable person would confuse the toy with Jack Daniel's. Rather, it says its product is a humorous and expressive work, and thus immune from the whiskey company's charge of patent infringement.
At Wednesday's argument, the justices struggled to reconcile their own previous decisions enforcing the nation's trademark laws and what some of them saw as a potential threat to free speech.
Jack Daniel's argued that a trademark is a property right that by its very nature limits some speech. "A property right by definition in the intellectual property area is one that restricts speech," said Blatt. "You have a limited monopoly on a right to use a name that's associated with your good or service."
Making the contrary argument was VIP's lawyer, Bennet Cooper. "In our popular culture, iconic brands are another kind of celebrity," he said. "People are constitutionally entitled to talk about celebrities and, yes, even make fun of them."
No clear sign from justices
As for the justices, they were all over the place, with conservative Justice Samuel Alito and liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor both asking questions about how the first amendment right of free speech intersects with trademark laws that are meant to protect brands and other intellectual property.
Assume, asked Sotomayor, that someone uses a political party logo, and creates a T-shirt with a picture of an obviously drunk Elephant, and a message that says, "Time to sober up America," and then sells it on Amazon. Isn't that a message protected by the First Amendment?
Justice Alito observed that if there is a conflict between trademark protection and the First Amendment, free speech wins. Beyond that, he said, no CEO would be stupid enough to authorize a dog toy like this one. "Could any reasonable person think that Jack Daniel's had approved this use of the mark?" he asked.
"Absolutely," replied lawyer Blatt, noting that business executives make blunders all the time. But Alito wasn't buying it. "I had a dog. I know something about dogs," he said. "The question is not what the average person would think. It's whether this should be a reasonable person standard, to simplify this whole thing."
But liberal Justice Elena Kagan and conservative Justice Neil Gorsuch repeatedly looked for an off ramp, a way for this case to be sent back to the lower court with instructions to either screen out or screen in some products when considering trademark infringement.
Kagan in particular did not find the dog toy remotely funny.
"This is a standard commercial product." she said. "This is not a political T-shirt. It's not a film. It's not an artistic photograph. It's nothing of those things."
What's more, she said, "I don't see the parody, but, you know, whatever."
At the end of the day, whatever the court is going to do with this case remained supremely unclear. Indeed, three of the justices were remarkably silent, giving no hints of their thinking whatsoever.
veryGood! (6549)
Related
- Why have wildfires been erupting across the East Coast this fall?
- Gerard Piqué Breaks Silence on Shakira Split and How It Affects Their Kids
- What we lose if Black Twitter disappears
- See Brandy's Magical Return as Cinderella in Descendants: The Rise of Red
- Ex-Marine misused a combat technique in fatal chokehold of NYC subway rider, trainer testifies
- The Real Reason Teresa Giudice Didn't Invite Melissa Gorga's Family to Her Wedding
- Artificial Intelligence Made Big Leaps In 2022 — Should We Be Excited Or Worried?
- Ariana Madix’s Next Career Move Revealed After Vanderpump Rules Breakup Drama
- Shawn Mendes Confesses He and Camila Cabello Are No Longer the Closest
- Italy calls a crisis meeting after pasta prices jump 20%
Ranking
- Todd Golden to continue as Florida basketball coach despite sexual harassment probe
- Scientists identify new species of demon catshark with white shiny irises
- Proof Austin Butler and Kaia Gerber's Love Is Burning Hot During Mexico Getaway
- Pakistan court orders ex-PM Imran Khan released on bail, bars his re-arrest for at least two weeks
- Mean Girls’ Lacey Chabert Details “Full Circle” Reunion With Lindsay Lohan and Amanda Seyfried
- Vanderpump Rules’ Ariana Madix Joins Scheana Shay and Lala Kent for Relaxing Outing Before Reunion
- TikTok's Taylor Frankie Paul Shares Update on Her Mental Health Journey After Arrest
- Princess Diana's Niece Lady Amelia Spencer Marries Greg Mallett in Fairytale South Africa Wedding
Recommendation
-
Channing Tatum Drops Shirtless Selfie After Zoë Kravitz Breakup
-
See Brandy's Magical Return as Cinderella in Descendants: The Rise of Red
-
Vanderpump Rules’ Lala Kent Has a Message for Raquel Leviss Before the Season 10 Reunion
-
NPR's most anticipated video games of 2023
-
'He's driving the bus': Jim Harbaugh effect paying dividends for Justin Herbert, Chargers
-
Stylist Law Roach Reveals the Scariest Part of His Retirement Journey
-
One of Grindr's favorite podcasts; plus, art versus AI
-
A pro-Russian social media campaign is trying to influence politics in Africa