Current:Home > MyNew York’s Right to ‘a Healthful Environment’ Could Be Bad News for Fossil Fuel Interests-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
New York’s Right to ‘a Healthful Environment’ Could Be Bad News for Fossil Fuel Interests
View Date:2024-12-23 22:36:28
When New York regulators denied a key permit to the controversial Williams Pipeline in early 2020, in part because it conflicted with the state’s climate law, environmental policy experts called it a potential turning point.
No longer could developers pitch major fossil fuel projects in the state without expecting serious regulatory scrutiny or legal challenges, climate campaigners said, touting the decision as a victory for the state’s clean energy aspirations.
That forecast was reinforced in October. State regulators denied permits for two proposed natural gas power plants, again citing the landmark climate law, which requires New York to transition its power sector to net-zero emissions by 2040 and to reduce overall greenhouse gas emissions 85 percent below 1990 levels by 2050.
Then, on election day, New York voters approved an amendment to the state constitution that granted all residents the right “to clean air and water and a healthful environment.” That amendment, which passed with nearly 70 percent of the vote, could strengthen lawsuits against polluters and further discourage developers from proposing fossil fuel projects in the state in the future, some energy experts have said.
The state’s climate law, paired with the new constitutional right to a clean and healthy environment, could set the stage for citizens to sue the government or other entities more easily for things like polluting a river or hindering the state’s legally binding clean energy targets, said Michael Gerrard, director of Columbia University’s Sabin Center for Climate Change Law.
Not only does the combustion of fossil fuels drive global warming but it emits harmful chemicals and particles into the air that have been proven to contribute to significant health risks and premature death. One recent study found that the soot commonly released by the burning of fossil fuels is responsible for more than 50,000 premature deaths in the United States every year.
“It certainly sends the message that (new) large, fossil fuel facilities are going to have major problems” in New York, Gerrard said. “I wouldn’t call those decisions a death knell, but they’re certainly a blinking red light.”
Exactly how much weight New York’s new constitutional right carries is still unclear, Gerrard said, and it may take several years for the courts to flesh out exactly what the provision means in concrete terms. Only a handful of states have similar environmental protection provisions in their constitutions, and an even smaller number have had state courts rule that those provisions are enforceable by law.
Out of the six states that have such constitutional provisions—Pennsylvania, Montana, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Illinois and Rhode Island—only courts in Pennsylvania, Montana and Hawaii have acted upon enforcing them, Gerrard said.
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court, for example, used the state’s constitutional right to a clean environment to overturn legislation that would have barred local governments from banning fracking on certain land, he said.
New York’s climate law has already played a big role in what has been a very public fight between a powerful natural gas industry and lawmakers who have been under mounting pressure from constituents to take global warming seriously. And the popularity of the clean environment amendment is only boosting confidence among climate advocates who want to see lawmakers take even stronger action to transition the state to clean energy.
For years, major utilities have sought to expand new gas infrastructure in New York, seeing the state’s quickly growing population as an opportunity for growth.
London-based National Grid alone planned to spend some $2.5 billion over three years on new natural gas projects in upstate New York, according to its 2018 annual report. The utility had also heavily lobbied for the Williams Pipeline, arguing that the project was necessary to meet the state’s quickly growing energy demand. The pipeline would have brought additional natural gas into New York City and Long Island from Pennsylvania.
But the recent permit rejections, along with the popularity of the new clean environment amendment, has sent “a clear message to the industry that there really isn’t a future here for new gas buildout in the state,” said Conor Bambrick, the director of climate policy for Environmental Advocates NY, a nonprofit that promotes green policies.
State lawmakers introduced legislation this year that would ban natural gas hookups in new construction. And New York City is considering a similar measure for its buildings, which the city council held a public hearing on earlier this week. Both proposals will likely face fierce opposition from the gas industry.
The state will release the first draft of its plan on how it aims to accomplish the ambitious targets under its climate law later this year, followed by another year for public input. And if lawmakers hope to meet those targets, they will likely have to adopt aggressive measures like a natural gas ban.
Preliminary results from a state-funded analysis in July found that New York is way off track to meet the emission reductions mandated by its climate law, even if the state implemented every proposal currently being considered.
That finding was a “real eye opener,” Bambrick said, but the overwhelming support he saw from voters on New York’s clean environment amendment helped boost his confidence that the state can get back on track to rein in emissions.
“The state is looking as if it’s going to come out with an aggressive plan,” he said. “It really bodes well for the future.”
veryGood! (85822)
Related
- Republican David Schweikert wins reelection in affluent Arizona congressional district
- Gymshark's Spring Clearance Styles Include $15 Sports Bras, $22 Leggings & More Must-Have Athleticwear
- Documents in abortion pill lawsuit raise questions about ex-husband's claims
- This Week in Clean Economy: ARPA-E’s Clean Energy Bets a Hard Sell with Congress, Investors
- 'Unfortunate error': 'Wicked' dolls with porn site on packaging pulled from Target, Amazon
- Aging Oil Pipeline Under the Great Lakes Should Be Closed, Michigan AG Says
- The big squeeze: ACA health insurance has lots of customers, small networks
- These Are the Best Appliances From Amazon for Small Kitchens
- Daniele Rustioni to become Metropolitan Opera’s principal guest conductor
- This doctor fought Ebola in the trenches. Now he's got a better way to stop diseases
Ranking
- Man Found Dead in Tanning Bed at Planet Fitness Gym After 3 Days
- Some Young Republicans Embrace a Slower, Gentler Brand of Climate Activism
- Idaho lawmakers pass a bill to prevent minors from leaving the state for abortion
- Sarah Jessica Parker Shares Sweet Tribute to Matthew Broderick for Their 26th Anniversary
- 'Cowboy Carter' collaborators to be first country artists to perform at Rolling Loud
- Claire Holt Reveals Pregnancy With Baby No. 3 on Cannes Red Carpet
- Ulta 24-Hour Flash Deal: Save 50% On the L’Ange Rotating Curling Iron That Does All the Work for You
- Review: 'Yellowstone' creator's 'Lioness' misses the point of a good spy thriller
Recommendation
-
Stock market today: Asian stocks dip as Wall Street momentum slows with cooling Trump trade
-
Alana Honey Boo Boo Thompson Graduates From High School and Mama June Couldn't Be Prouder
-
Shark Week 2023 is here! Shop nautical merch from these brands to celebrate the occasion
-
Gemini Shoppable Horoscope: 11 Birthday Gifts The Air Sign Will Love
-
'Gladiator 2' review: Yes, we are entertained again by outrageous sequel
-
Transcript: Sen. Richard Blumenthal on Face the Nation, June 18, 2023
-
This Week in Clean Economy: Manufacturing Job Surge Seen for East Coast Offshore Wind
-
U.S. Soldiers Falling Ill, Dying in the Heat as Climate Warms