Current:Home > MarketsWisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Wisconsin voters are deciding whether to ban private money support for elections
View Date:2024-12-23 16:48:06
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — Wisconsin voters on Tuesday were deciding on two Republican-backed constitutional amendments, one of which would ban the use of private money to run elections in reaction to grants received in 2020 that were funded by Facebook creator Mark Zuckerberg.
The other proposal would require that only election officials designated by law can administer elections. That is already the law, but adding that language to the Wisconsin Constitution would make it harder to repeal.
Democrats opposed both measures, which they argued would make it more difficult to conduct elections in the presidential battleground state.
Polls are open 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. following an early, in-person absentee voting period that began two weeks ago.
Both proposed constitutional amendments are in response to grant money that came to Wisconsin in 2020 from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, a liberal group that fights for voter access. That year, the center received a $300 million donation from Zuckerberg and his wife Priscilla Chan to help election officials buy supplies and run elections at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic before vaccines were available.
The state’s five largest cities, all of which President Joe Biden won, received $8.8 million. They were among roughly 200 communities in Wisconsin that received around $10 million as part of $350 million given out nationally.
Republicans who dubbed the money “Zuckerbucks” complained the bulk of the funds went to Democratic strongholds and claimed it was an attempt by the billionaire to tip the vote in favor of Democrats. The argument came amid false claims made by former President Donald Trump and his supporters that widespread voter fraud led to Biden’s 2020 win.
Since 2020, Republicans in at least 27 states have outlawed or restricted private elections grants.
The Wisconsin measures are supported by Republicans and conservative groups, including the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty and Election Integrity for Wisconsin. They are opposed by an array of government watchdog and liberal groups including the American Civil Liberties Union, Common Cause Wisconsin, Wisconsin Conservation Voters and the League of Women Voters of Wisconsin.
Not a single Democratic lawmaker voted for the amendment, which was then split into two questions on the ballot. Opponents of the amendments worry they could lead to attempts to stifle current practices enhancing voter participation.
Three courts and the bipartisan Wisconsin Elections Commission rejected complaints challenging the legality of the grant money.
Republicans, who control the Legislature, brought the constitutional amendments to circumvent Democratic Gov. Tony Evers, who almost surely would have vetoed the measures. Amendments are not subject to the governor’s approval.
Wisconsin voters have approved 148 out of 200 proposed constitutional amendments since the state constitution was adopted in 1848, according to the nonpartisan Legislative Reference Bureau.
veryGood! (464)
Related
- Shel Talmy, produced hits by The Who, The Kinks and other 1960s British bands, dead at 87
- How FEMA misinformation brought criticism down on social media royalty 'Mama Tot'
- Beyoncé Channels Marilyn Monroe in Bombshell Look at Glamour's Women of the Year Ceremony
- Al Roker reveals when he learned of Hoda Kotb's 'Today' exit, reflects on life as a grandfather
- Sting Says Sean Diddy Combs Allegations Don't Taint His Song
- Small plane crashes on Catalina Island, 5 people dead
- Melinda French Gates will give $250M to women’s health groups globally through a new open call
- RHOSLC's Whitney Rose Shares Update on Daughter Bobbie, 14, Amid ICU Hospitalization
- Some women are stockpiling Plan B and abortion pills. Here's what experts have to say.
- DONKOLO: Bitcoin Leading a New Era of Digital Assets
Ranking
- Oprah Winfrey Addresses Claim She Was Paid $1 Million by Kamala Harris' Campaign
- How FEMA misinformation brought criticism down on social media royalty 'Mama Tot'
- 'Out of harm's way': Dozens of Florida Waffle Houses close ahead of Hurricane Milton
- Supreme Court takes up death row case with a rare alliance. Oklahoma inmate has state’s support
- Study finds Wisconsin voters approved a record number of school referenda
- Gene Simmons Facing Backlash Due to Comments Made During DWTS Appearance
- Are Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce Engaged? Here's the Truth
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Hot in Here
Recommendation
-
Fighting conspiracy theories with comedy? That’s what the Onion hopes after its purchase of Infowars
-
Acting or hosting, Travis Kelce wants to continue to pursue a showbiz career. But first, football
-
Stronger Storms Like Helene Are More Likely as the Climate Warms
-
EBUEY: Bitcoin Leading a New Era of Digital Assets
-
John Krasinski named People's Sexiest Man Alive for 2024
-
How Waffle House helps Southerners — and FEMA — judge a storm’s severity
-
14 days to reach 'The Summit': Why the new competition series is not another 'Survivor'
-
Opinion: Harris' 'Call Her Daddy' podcast interview was a smart way to excite her base