Current:Home > Contact-usHow a New White House Memo Could Undermine Science in U.S. Policy-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
How a New White House Memo Could Undermine Science in U.S. Policy
View Date:2024-12-23 14:28:45
This story has been updated with EPA’s response.
President Donald Trump’s administration has launched yet another attempt to control the use of science in federal policymaking—this time with a memorandum to government agencies from the White House budget office.
The memo, quietly released on Wednesday, appears aimed at putting into effect some long-sought goals of industry foes of environmental regulations.
Described as “guidance” for executive branch agencies, it offers numerous new avenues for regulated industries to challenge the science used in policymaking. The memo was signed by Russell Vought, a former top official at the political arm of the conservative Heritage Foundation who is now acting director of the White House Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Observers say the OMB is seeking to implement by fiat restrictions on environmental and health science that have failed to garner support in Congress and have foundered in a formal rulemaking process begun last year by the Environmental Protection Agency.
“There’s been no consultation with the scientific community, no opportunity to comment, no analysis on the costs or impacts,” said Andrew Rosenberg, director of the Center for Science and Democracy at the Union of Concerned Scientists.
Vought’s memo, titled “Improving Implementation of the Information Quality Act,” sets out new guidance for all federal agencies on identifying and using “influential scientific, financial, or statistical information.”
It says that such data should be held to higher standards than other information, with a more in-depth peer review required. That review should evaluate “the objectivity of the underlying data and the sensitivity of the agency’s conclusions to analytic assumptions,” with additional peer review required in some circumstances.
Data of this kind, such as health surveys, are often used to support controls on pollutants, including those like smog and soot that come from burning fossil fuels. The guidance could also affect how limits on greenhouse gas emissions are devised.
Vought writes that influential analysis must be disseminated to the public “with sufficient descriptions of data and methods to allow them to be reproduced by qualified third parties who may want to test the sensitivity of agency analyses.”
Echoes of EPA’s ‘Secret Science’ Effort
The OMB memo appears aimed at achieving the same goals as EPA’s proposal last year, the so-called “Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science” rule, which sought to prevent the EPA from relying on public health studies where the raw data had not been made public due to confidentiality concerns. It mirrored legislation sponsored by former Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas), then chairman of the House Science Committee, that was passed by the House of Representatives three times but never been taken up by the Senate.
Under the guise of transparency, the EPA rule would have excluded from environmental policymaking some of the seminal studies linking air pollution to increased mortality.
The EPA received more than 500,000 public comments on the transparency proposal, including an extraordinary outpouring of opposition from the scientific community—including the presidents of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine; the leaders of physicians’ groups like the American Academy of Pediatrics; health organizations like the American Lung Association; and the editors of major scientific journals.
No further public action has occurred on the rule since the comment period closed last August. An EPA spokesperson said in an email that the agency “is considering the new OMB memorandum as we move forward with the ‘Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science’ rulemaking.”
‘It’s About Delay’
It is not clear exactly what impact the OMB guidance will have—in part because this kind of guidance doesn’t have the force and effect of law. (In other words, the requirements and deadlines of environmental statutes would weigh more heavily before a judge.) Also, Vought does not specify what the EPA or other agencies are to do about influential scientific studies that do not meet the new requirements. But Rosenberg said it appears to offer the regulated industry new avenues to challenge actions that rely on science.
“It’s about delay,” said Rosenberg. “Every piece of this allows industry to make a claim that will delay the process of regulations.
“It essentially says that anyone—mostly industry—can challenge the data or technical information, and the agency then has to develop a response to every challenge, and then the person who challenged the data can appeal, and you have to go through this cycle again, apparently endlessly.”
Vought, known as a conservative firebrand who served as an aide to Vice President Mike Pence when Pence was a member of Congress, played a key role in the budget controversies that engulfed the White House early this year. He reportedly designed Trump’s initial proposal for border wall funding and led the decision to continue processing tax refunds during the government shutdown.
Vought’s memo on information quality portrays the new guidance as a good government measure. “Prudent decision making depends on reliable, high-quality information,” Vought wrote. “Congress has long recognized that federal agencies should make decisions using the best data reasonably available, and Congress has entrusted OMB with the statutory role of ensuring that federal agencies collect, use, and disseminate information that is fit for its intended purpose.”
veryGood! (19)
Related
- Drone footage captures scope of damage, destruction from deadly Louisville explosion
- Coast Guard, Navy team up for daring rescue of mother, daughter and pets near Hawaii
- Joshua Jackson Shares Rare Insight Into Bond With His and Jodie Turner-Smith's 4-Year-Old Daughter
- Meet the Hunter RMV Sherpa X-Line, the 'affordable' off-road RV camper
- How Kim Kardashian Navigates “Uncomfortable” Situations With Her 4 Kids
- What is the birthstone for September? Get to know the fall month's stunning gem
- Derek Jeter to be Michigan's honorary captain against Texas
- Family found dead after upstate New York house fire were not killed by the flames, police say
- What happens to Donald Trump’s criminal conviction? Here are a few ways it could go
- Virginia mother charged with cruelty, neglect after kids found chained in apartment
Ranking
- Wisconsin authorities believe kayaker staged his disappearance and fled to Europe
- Alabama man charged with murder in gas station shooting deaths of 3 near Birmingham
- Matthew Gaudreau's Pregnant Wife Madeline Shares What’s Keeping Her Going After His Tragic Death
- Joey Chestnut vs. Kobayashi: Chestnut sets record in winning hot dog eating rematch
- Kendall Jenner Is Back to Being a Brunette After Ditching Blonde Hair
- Queen Camilla Shares Update on King Charles III's Health Amid Cancer Treatment
- Murder on Music Row: Predatory promoters bilk Nashville's singing newcomers
- Real Housewives of Beverly Hills Star Kyle Richards Says This $29.98 Bikini Looks Like a Chanel Dupe
Recommendation
-
Taylor Swift drops Christmas merchandise collection, including for 'Tortured Poets' era
-
Jewel supports Chappell Roan's harassment comments: 'I've had hundreds of stalkers'
-
US closes 5-year probe of General Motors SUV seat belt failures due to added warranty coverage
-
Mexico finds the devil is in the details with laws against gender-based attacks on women politicians
-
NASCAR Hall of Fame driver Bobby Allison dies at 86
-
Browns sign 20-year stadium rights deal with Huntington Bank as they position for possible new home
-
Elle Macpherson reveals she battled breast cancer and declined chemotherapy: 'People thought I was crazy'
-
Queen Camilla Shares Update on King Charles III's Health Amid Cancer Treatment