Current:Home > FinanceJudge allows lawsuit that challenges Idaho’s broad abortion ban to move forward-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Judge allows lawsuit that challenges Idaho’s broad abortion ban to move forward
View Date:2024-12-23 21:24:40
An Idaho judge on Friday denied a request by the state’s top legal chief to throw out a lawsuit seeking to clarify the exemptions tucked inside the state’s broad abortion ban.
Instead, 4th District Judge Jason Scott narrowed the case to focus only on the circumstances where an abortion would be allowed and whether abortion care in emergency situations applies to Idaho’s state constitutional right to enjoy and defend life and the right to secure safety.
Scott’s decision comes just two weeks after a hearing where Idaho’s Attorney General Raul Labrador’s office attempted to dismiss the case spearheaded by four women and several physicians, who filed the case earlier this year.
Similar lawsuits are playing out around the nation, with some of them, like Idaho’s, brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of doctors and pregnant people who were denied access to abortions while facing serious pregnancy complications.
According to the Center for Reproductive Rights, Idaho’s Constitution entitles its residents to certain fundamental rights, but a sweeping abortion ban poses a risk to those rights.
Labrador’s office countered that the Idaho Supreme Court has already upheld the state’s abortion bans — thus solving any lingering questions on the matter.
Scott agreed in part with the state attorneys that the state Supreme Court ruled there was no fundamental right to abortion inside the state constitution, but added that the court didn’t reject “every conceivable as applied challenge that might be made in a future case.”
“We’re grateful the court saw through the state’s callous attempt to ignore the pain and suffering their laws are causing Idahoans,” said Gail Deady, a senior staff attorney for the Center for Reproductive Rights. “Now the state of Idaho will be forced to answer to these women in a court of law.”
Meanwhile, the Idaho judge also sided with the attorney general in removing Gov. Brad Little, Labrador, and the Idaho Board of Medicine as named defendants in the lawsuit — leaving the state of Idaho as the only remaining defendant. Scott called the long list of defendants as “redundant,” saying that all three would be subject to whatever is ultimately decided in the lawsuit.
“This is only the beginning of this litigation, but the Attorney General is encouraged by this ruling,” Labrador’s office said in a statement. “He has long held that the named defendants were simply inappropriate, and that our legislatively passed laws do not violate the Idaho Constitution by narrowly limiting abortions or interfering with a doctor’s right to practice medicine.”
The four women named in the case were all denied abortions in Idaho after learning they were pregnant with fetuses that were unlikely to go to term or survive birth, and that the pregnancies also put them at risk of serious medical complications. All four traveled to Oregon or Washington for the procedures.
Idaho has several abortion bans, but notably Idaho lawmakers approved a ban as a trigger law in March of 2020, before the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade.
At the time, any suggestion that the ban could harm pregnant people was quickly brushed off by the bill’s sponsor, Republican Sen. Todd Lakey, who said during one debate that the health of the mother “weighs less, yes, than the life of the child.”
The trigger ban took effect in 2022. Since then, Idaho’s roster of obstetricians and other pregnancy-related specialists has been shrinking.
veryGood! (17848)
Related
- Sydney Sweeney Slams Women Empowerment in the Industry as Being Fake
- From balmy to brrr: Wisconsin cities see a nearly 60-degree temperature swing in under 24 hours
- NTSB report casts doubt on driver’s claim that truck’s steering locked in crash that killed cyclists
- New York AG says meat producing giant made misleading environmental claims to boost sales
- Dramatic video shows Phoenix police rescue, pull man from car submerged in pool: Watch
- A California county ditched its vote counting machines. Now a supporter faces a recall election
- Minnesota budget surplus grows a little to $3.7B on higher tax revenues from corporate profits
- Caleb Williams said he would be 'excited' to be drafted by Bears or Commanders
- Rep. Michael McCaul of Texas says he was detained in airport over being ‘disoriented’
- Wind advisories grip the Midwest as storms move east after overnight tornado warnings
Ranking
- Cold case arrest: Florida man being held in decades-old Massachusetts double murder
- McConnell will step down as the Senate Republican leader in November after a record run in the job
- Dwayne Johnson wants to know which actor 'screamed' at 'Hercules' co-star Rebecca Ferguson
- Meet Syracuse's Dyaisha Fair, the best scorer in women's college basketball not named Caitlin Clark
- Stocks soared on news of Trump's election. Bonds sank. Here's why.
- French Senate approves a bill to make abortion a constitutional right
- CDC braces for shortage after tetanus shot discontinued, issues new guidance
- We owe it to our moms: See who our Women of the Year look to for inspiration
Recommendation
-
Judge extends the time to indict the driver accused of killing Johnny Gaudreau and his brother
-
We may be living in the golden age of older filmmakers. This year’s Oscars are evidence
-
What the data reveal about U.S. labor unrest
-
Founder of New York narcotics delivery service gets 12 years for causing 3 overdose deaths
-
Stop What You're Doing—Moo Deng Just Dropped Her First Single
-
Cat Janice, singer who went viral after dedicating last song to son amid cancer, dies at 31
-
Caitlin Clark and her achievements stand on their own. Stop comparing her to Pistol Pete
-
Paulina Porizkova, model, writer and advocate for embracing aging, is a Woman of the Year honoree