Current:Home > MarketsJudge rules out possibility of punitive damages in Smartmatic defamation lawsuit against Newsmax-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Judge rules out possibility of punitive damages in Smartmatic defamation lawsuit against Newsmax
View Date:2024-12-23 15:24:53
DOVER, Del. (AP) — A Delaware judge on Monday ruled out the possibility of punitive damages in a defamation lawsuit pitting an electronic voting machine manufacturer targeted by allies of former President Donald Trump against a conservative news outlet that aired accusations of vote manipulation in the 2020 election.
The ruling by Superior Court Judge Eric Davis comes just days before jury selection is set to begin in a court battle between Florida-based Smartmatic and cable network Newsmax.
Smartmatic claims that Newsmax program hosts and guests made false and defamatory statements in November and December 2020 implying that Smartmatic participated in rigging the results and that its software was used to switch votes. Newsmax, also based in Florida, argues that it was simply reporting on newsworthy allegations being made by Trump and his supporters, including former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani and conservative attorney Sidney Powell.
In a ruling earlier this month, Davis said statements regarding Smartmatic software or voting machines altering the results of the election are “factually false.” Importantly, however, he rejected Smartmatic’s claim that Newsmax acted with “express malice” under Florida law, meaning that its primary motivation was to injure Smartmatic.
“There is no evidence that Newsmax acted with evil intent towards Smartmatic,” Davis wrote.
Attorneys for Newsmax sought clarification of that ruling, arguing that it meant Smartmatic could not seek punitive damages for any alleged defamation. Newsmax said Smartmatic had agreed that it must prove both express malice and actual malice to recover punitive damages.
Smartmatic denied any such stipulation and said its definition of express malice was not the same as Newsmax’s. Smartmatic said it uses the term as an “imprecise shorthand term” for a state of mind distinct from actual malice. Punitive damages, subject to a cap, are appropriate if a jury finds intentional misconduct or gross negligence by a defendant, regardless of any intent to harm the plaintiff, Smartmatic claimed.
The judge on Monday rejected those arguments, saying express malice is well-defined under Florida law, and that Florida law requires both actual malice and express malice for punitive damages. To prove actual malice, Smartmatic must show that Newsmax acted with “reckless disregard for the truth,” or with knowledge that the statements being aired were false.
“(T)he law in Florida is that in order to sustain an award of punitive damages, the plaintiff must present that the defendant’s feelings toward the plaintiff evidenced ill will, hostility or evil intent,” wrote Davis, adding that Smartmatic had agreed with Newsmax about punitive damages in a pretrial stipulation.
“The court will not allow the jury to consider the issue of punitive damages in the trial,” he concluded.
Newsmax issued a statement praising the ruling, adding that Smartmatic’s lawsuit “threatens freedom of speech and freedom of press.”
Smartmatic said in a statement that the ruling will not deter it from seeking to hold Newsmax liable for its “reckless defamation” and to recover “significant damages.”
In an earlier ruling, Davis said Newsmax would be allowed to argue that it is protected from liability under Florida’s “neutral reporting privilege,” which extends to “disinterested and neutral reporting” on matters of public concern. Newsmax argues that the privilege applies because many of the allegedly defamatory statements were made by third parties appearing as guests or were rebroadcast after being made by third parties on non-Newsmax platforms.
In a ruling favoring Smartmatic, Davis also said earlier this month that he would limit evidence by Newsmax regarding a federal criminal investigation that led to indictments last month against three current and former Smartmatic executives, including the company’s Venezuelan-born co-founder, Roger Piñate. The charges involve an alleged scheme to pay more than $1 million in bribes to put Smartmatic voting machines in the Philippines. Newsmax argued that the investigation and indictment should be presented to jurors as alternative reasons for any purported reputational harm or economic loss that Smartmatic blames on Newsmax.
The judge denied Smartmatic’s motion to prohibit Newsmax from mentioning evidence regarding Smartmatic witnesses who have invoked their Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. Davis said that issue will have to be decided on a “question-to-question” basis at trial. Piñate is among the witnesses scheduled to testify.
The Delaware lawsuit, which takes issue with Newsmax reports over a five-week period in late 2020, is one of several stemming from reports by conservative news outlets following the election. Smartmatic also is suing Fox News for defamation in New York and recently settled a lawsuit in the District of Columbia against the One America News Network, another conservative outlet.
Dominion Voting Systems similarly filed several defamation lawsuits against those who spread conspiracy theories blaming its election equipment for Trump’s loss. Last year, in a case presided over by Davis, Fox News settled with Dominion for $787 million.
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Controversial comedian Shane Gillis announces his 'biggest tour yet'
- Will the Federal Reserve cut interest rates fast enough to deliver a ‘soft landing’?
- Keep Up with Good American’s Friends & Family Sale—Save 30% off Khloé Kardashian’s Jeans, Tops & More
- They often foot the bill. But, can parents ask for college grades?
- Man gets a life sentence in the shotgun death of a New Mexico police officer
- Two ex-fire chiefs in New York City charged in corruption scandal
- An American pastor detained in China for nearly 20 years has been released
- Here's What Artem Chigvintsev Is Seeking in Nikki Garcia Divorce
- Trump ally Steve Bannon blasts ‘lawfare’ as he faces New York trial after federal prison stint
- New York officials to release new renderings of possible Gilgo Beach victim
Ranking
- School workers accused of giving special needs student with digestive issue hot Takis, other abuse
- Kate Spade's Top 100 Under $100: $259 Bag for Just $49 Today Only, Plus Extra 20% Off Select Styles
- NFL Week 2 overreactions: Are the Saints a top contender? Ravens, Dolphins in trouble
- 2024 Emmys: Rita Ora Shares Rare Insight Into Marriage With Taika Waititi
- New Jersey will issue a drought warning after driest October ever and as wildfires rage
- The Reformation x Kacey Musgraves Collab Perfectly Captures the Singer's Aesthetic & We're Obsessed
- Trump was on the links taking a breather from the campaign. Then the Secret Service saw a rifle
- Titanic Submersible Passengers’ Harrowing “All Good Here” Text Revealed
Recommendation
-
GM recalls 460k cars for rear wheel lock-up: Affected models include Chevrolet, GMC, Cadillac
-
Will same policies yield a different response from campus leaders at the University of California?
-
An Iowa shootout leaves a fleeing suspect dead and 2 police officers injured
-
Votes for Cornel West and Claudia De la Cruz will count in Georgia for now
-
Diamond Sports Group will offer single-game pricing to stream NBA and NHL games starting next month
-
Rumer Willis Kisses Mystery Man After Derek Richard Thomas Breakup
-
'Hacks' star's mom and former SNL cast member slams 'The Bear,' says it's not a comedy
-
Shooting leaves 1 dead in Detroit at popular tailgating location after Lions game, police say