Current:Home > MarketsWith Pipeline Stopped, Fight Ramps Up Against ‘Keystone of the Great Lakes’-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
With Pipeline Stopped, Fight Ramps Up Against ‘Keystone of the Great Lakes’
View Date:2024-12-23 16:50:27
In the wake of the Keystone XL decision, environmental activists are seizing the momentum by calling for the cancellation of another tar sands pipeline that has remained largely below the radar.
On Tuesday, local and national groups urged the Obama administration to reject Enbridge’s Alberta Clipper pipeline expansion. The pipeline has a permit to carry 450,000 barrels of oil per day from Alberta to Superior, Wisc., but is effectively moving nearly twice that amount—800,000 barrels—because Enbridge has diverted the flow through another pipeline at the U.S.-Canada border.
Environmental groups say the scheme is illegal. Last year, a coalition of organizations, including the National Wildlife Federation, Minnesota’s White Earth Nation and the Sierra Club, sued the State Department for allowing Enbridge to proceed. A decision is pending.
The “State Department is turning a blind eye,” said Winona LaDuke, executive director of the indigenous environmental justice organization Honor the Earth, in a statement. She called the Alberta Clipper the “Keystone XL of the Great Lakes region.”
Environmentalists find tar sands oil particularly troublesome because it’s 17 percent more carbon-intensive than conventional crude oil. It’s also harder to clean up when it spills in water. President Obama rejected the Keystone XL pipeline two weeks ago based partly on its climate impact, ending a contentious seven-year debate.
With Keystone out of the way, green groups are rallying around other causes, including the Alberta Clipper. At the heart of the controversy is whether Enbridge—the Canadian company responsible for a million-gallon tar sands spill in Michigan that cost more than $1 billion to clean up—skirted the law. Cross-border pipelines need a permit from the State Department for construction and certain modifications.
Enbridge applied for an expansion for the Alberta Clipper in 2012, launching a years-long review process. A State Department spokesperson said the agency is drafting an environmental impact statement and plans to gather public comments.
In the meantime, Enbridge found another way to increase oil shipments. The Alberta Clipper (also called Line 67) runs parallel to a separate Enbridge oil pipeline, Line 3, at the Canadian border. Enbridge replaced a 17-mile section of Line 3 at the border crossing with brand-new pipe that can handle large volumes of tar sands oil. The company then built connections between Line 3 and the Alberta Clipper. (Enbridge called the Line 3 modification a “maintenance” project and did not apply for a State Department permit).
Since July, oil from the Alberta Clipper has been diverted into the new segment of Line 3 at the border, then put back into the Clipper for the rest of the trip to Superior. At the same time, the traditional crude oil shipped through Line 3 takes a brief detour through the Clipper before returning to Line 3 after the border crossing. This border swap allows Enbridge to ship up to 800,000 barrels per day through the Clipper pipeline.
When Enbridge first proposed this idea last year, environmental law experts questioned the legality of the plan, which they said was a clear attempt to “piecemeal” the project.
In mid-October, 11 U.S. Senators led by Al Franken (D-Minn.) wrote a letter to the State Department expressing similar concerns. Specifically, they questioned whether there are limits on the “length of time or volume of product that this diversion can be used for” while the State Department reviews the Clipper expansion application.
Terri Larson, an Enbridge spokeswoman, said in an email that the pipeline detour is “an interim measure” that “provided flexibility to optimize our permitted cross-border capacity on both lines, so that we can meet customer demands” while the State Department reviews the Clipper application, “a process that is taking longer than anticipated.”
“This approach is in keeping with the terms of the presidential permits previously issued by the State Department for Lines 3 and 67,” she wrote.
The plaintiffs behind the ongoing Alberta Clipper lawsuit argue the detour violates NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act), the federal law that forces the State Department to examine the project’s environmental impacts.
Jim Murphy, senior counsel for the National Wildlife Federation and an attorney in the lawsuit, said the case also alleges the Line 3 replacement work should have triggered a State Department NEPA review.
The agency hasn’t challenged Enbridge’s actions on either pipeline, and a spokesperson from the agency said it doesn’t comment on ongoing litigation.
Andy Pearson, Midwest tar sands coordinator for MN350, said the agency’s complacency indicates that “all that matters to the U.S. government is a couple of miles at the border.”
MN350 is the Minnesota chapter of 350.org, a national environmental group that played a leading role in the anti-Keystone movement.
Pearson said the Clipper process should trigger the same scrutiny given to the Keystone XL—and he believes once the process is applied correctly, it will fail President Obama’s climate test.
“This is exactly the same sized pipe, same oil, same destination, and it’s in the same presidential permit process,” he said. “So I can’t see President Obama being able to construct a scenario in which this pipeline” clears the bar.
Correction 11/20/15: This story has been updated to clarify the lawsuit’s allegations about the Line 3 replacement work.
veryGood! (99361)
Related
- Chipotle unveils cilantro-scented soap, 'water' cup candles in humorous holiday gift line
- Maldives gives port clearance to a Chinese ship. The move could inflame a dispute with India
- Kansas lawmakers want a report on last year’s police raid of a newspaper
- French tourist finds 7.46-carat diamond at Crater of Diamonds State Park in Arkansas
- Quincy Jones' Cause of Death Revealed
- Michigan player wins $4.37 million, becomes first Lotto 47 jackpot winner of 2024
- Canada is preparing for a second Trump presidency. Trudeau says Trump ‘represents uncertainty’
- Pilot dies after small plane crashes at Clinton National Airport in Little Rock, Arkansas
- Charles Hanover: Caution, Bitcoin May Be Entering a Downward Trend!
- Michigan player wins $4.37 million, becomes first Lotto 47 jackpot winner of 2024
Ranking
- Garth Brooks wants to move his sexual assault case to federal court. How that could help the singer.
- Vermont governor proposes $8.6 billion budget and urges the Legislature not to raise taxes, fees
- Tristan Thompson Suspended for 25 Games After Violating NBA Anti-Drug Program
- Los Angeles Times to lay off one-fourth of newsroom staff starting this week, union head says
- NY forest ranger dies fighting fires as air quality warnings are issued in New York and New Jersey
- New Hampshire takeaways: Trump’s path becomes clearer. So does the prospect of a rematch with Biden.
- North Dakota judge won’t block part of abortion law doctors say puts them at risk of prosecution
- How America Ferrera’s Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants Costars Celebrated Her Oscar Nomination
Recommendation
-
Top Federal Reserve official defends central bank’s independence in wake of Trump win
-
Adored Benito the giraffe moved in Mexico to a climate much better-suited for him
-
A blast of cold lets gators show off a special skill to survive icy weather
-
Expend4bles leads 2024 Razzie Awards nominations, with 7
-
Deebo Samuel explains 'out of character' sideline altercation with 49ers long snapper, kicker
-
Dwayne The Rock Johnson gets ownership rights to his nickname, joins TKO's board
-
Judge says Canada’s use of Emergencies Act to quell truckers’ protests over COVID was unreasonable
-
Phoenix woman gets 37-year prison sentence in death of her baby from malnutrition, medical neglect