Current:Home > Contact-usHigh Oil Subsidies Ensure Profit for Nearly Half New U.S. Investments, Study Shows-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
High Oil Subsidies Ensure Profit for Nearly Half New U.S. Investments, Study Shows
View Date:2024-12-23 20:17:21
Government subsidies to American energy companies are generous enough to ensure that almost half of new investments in untapped domestic oil projects would be profitable, creating incentives to keep pumping fossil fuels despite climate concerns, according to a new study.
The result would seriously undermine the 2015 Paris climate agreement, whose goals of reining in global warming can only be met if much of the world’s oil reserves are left in the ground.
The study, in Nature Energy, examined the impact of federal and state subsidies at recent oil prices that hover around $50 a barrel and estimated that the support could increase domestic oil production by a total of 17 billion barrels “over the next few decades.”
Using that oil would put the equivalent of 6 billion tonnes of CO2 into the atmosphere, the authors calculated.
Taxpayers give fossil fuel companies in the U.S. more than $20 billion annually in federal and state subsidies, according to a separate report released today by the environmental advocacy group Oil Change International. During the Obama administration, the U.S. and other major greenhouse gas emitters pledged to phase out fossil fuel supports. But the future of such policies is in jeopardy given the enthusiastic backing President Donald Trump has given the fossil fuel sector.
The study in Nature Energy focused on the U.S. because it is the world’s largest producer of fossil fuels and offers hefty subsidies. The authors said they looked at the oil industry specifically because it gets double the amount of government support that coal does, in the aggregate.
Written by scientists and economists from the Stockholm Environment Institute and Earth Track, which monitors energy subsidies, the study “suggests that oil resources may be more dependent on subsidies than previously thought.”
The authors looked at all U.S. oil fields that had been identified but not yet developed by mid-2016, a total of more than 800. They were then divided into four groups: the big oil reservoirs of North Dakota, Texas and the Gulf of Mexico, and the fourth, a catch-all for smaller onshore deposits around the country. The subsidies fell into three groups: revenue that the government decides to forgo, such as taxes; the government’s assumption of accident and environmental liability for industry’s own actions, and the state’s below-market rate provision of certain services.
The authors then assumed a minimum rate of return of 10 percent for a project to move forward. The question then becomes “whether the subsidies tip the project from being uneconomic to economic,” clearing that 10 percent rate-of-return threshold.
The authors discovered that many of the not-yet-developed projects in the country’s largest oil fields would only be economically feasible if they received subsidies. In Texas’s Permian Basin, 40 percent of those projects would be subsidy-dependent, and in North Dakota’s Williston Basin, 59 percent would be, according to the study.
Subsidies “distort markets to increase fossil fuel production,” the authors concluded.
“Our findings suggest an expanded case for fossil fuel subsidy reform,” the authors wrote. “Not only would removing federal and state support provide a fiscal benefit” to taxpayers and the budget, “but it could also result in substantial climate benefits” by keeping carbon the ground rather than sending it into a rapidly warming atmosphere.
veryGood! (12693)
Related
- Tennessee fugitive accused of killing a man and lying about a bear chase is caught in South Carolina
- Students, here are top savings hacks as you head back to campus
- Man arrested in the 1993 cold case killing of 19-year-old Carmen Van Huss
- Was Abraham Lincoln gay? A new documentary suggests he was a 'lover of men'
- Bluesky has added 1 million users since the US election as people seek alternatives to X
- Half of Southern California home on sale for 'half a million' after being hit by pine tree
- Ben Affleck’s Surprising Family Connection to The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives
- Revving engines, fighter jets and classical tunes: The inspirations behind EV sounds
- Judge recuses himself in Arizona fake elector case after urging response to attacks on Kamala Harris
- Meghann Fahy Reveals Whether She'd Go Back to The Bold Type
Ranking
- NFL overreactions: New York Jets, Dallas Cowboys going nowhere after Week 10
- What to watch: Say his name!
- Man arrested after making threats, assaulting women in downtown Louisville, Kentucky
- Shooter at Southern University frat party takes plea deal
- Georgia remains part of College Football Playoff bracket projection despite loss
- Beyoncé and Jay-Z Put in Their Love on Top in Rare Birthday Vacation Photos
- Israeli soldiers fatally shot an American woman at a West Bank protest, witnesses say
- August jobs report: Economy added disappointing 142,000 jobs as unemployment fell to 4.2%
Recommendation
-
Justine Bateman feels like she can breathe again in 'new era' after Trump win
-
Are we moving toward a cashless, checkless society?
-
15-year-old detained in Georgia for threats about 'finishing the job' after school shooting
-
'Words do not exist': Babysitter charged in torture death of 6-year-old California boy
-
Dozens indicted over NYC gang warfare that led to the deaths of four bystanders
-
AP Decision Notes: What to expect in Delaware’s state primaries
-
Man arrested after making threats, assaulting women in downtown Louisville, Kentucky
-
Michigan judge loses docket after she’s recorded insulting gays and Black people