Current:Home > MyTexas must remove floating Rio Grande border barrier, federal appeals court rules-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Texas must remove floating Rio Grande border barrier, federal appeals court rules
View Date:2024-12-23 18:34:52
Texas must move a floating barrier on the Rio Grande that drew backlash from Mexico, a federal appeals court ruled Friday, dealing a blow to one of Republican Gov. Greg Abbott's aggressive measures aimed at stopping migrants from entering the U.S. illegally.
The decision by the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals requires Texas to stop any work on the roughly 1,000-foot barrier and move it to the riverbank. The order sided with a lower court decision in September that Abbott called "incorrect" and had predicted would be overturned.
Instead, the New Orleans-based court handed Texas its second legal defeat this week over its border operations. On Wednesday, a federal judge allowed U.S. Border Patrol agents to continue cutting razor wire the state installed along the riverbank, despite the protests of Texas officials.
For months, Texas has asserted that parts of the Rio Grande are not subject to federal laws protecting navigable waters. But the judges said the lower court correctly sided with the Biden administration.
"It considered the threat to navigation and federal government operations on the Rio Grande, as well as the potential threat to human life the floating barrier created," Judge Dana Douglas wrote in the opinion.
Abbott called the decision "clearly wrong" in a statement on social media, and said the state would immediately seek a rehearing from the court.
"We'll go to SCOTUS if needed to protect Texas from Biden's open borders," Abbott posted.
The Biden administration sued Abbott over the linked and anchored buoys — which stretch roughly the length of three soccer fields — after the state installed the barrier along the international border with Mexico. The buoys are between the Texas border city of Eagle Pass and Piedras Negras, Coahuila.
Thousands of people were crossing into the U.S. illegally through the area when the barrier was installed. The lower district court ordered the state to move the barriers in September, but Texas' appeal temporarily delayed that order from taking effect.
The Biden administration sued under what is known as the Rivers and Harbors Act, a law that protects navigable waters.
In a dissent, Judge Don Willet, an appointee of former President Donald Trump and a former Texas Supreme Court justice, said the order to move the barriers won't dissolve any tensions that the Biden administration said have been ramping up between the U.S. and Mexico governments.
"If the district court credited the United States' allegations of harm, then it should have ordered the barrier to be not just moved but removed," Willet wrote. "Only complete removal would eliminate the "construction and presence" of the barrier and meet Mexico's demands."
Nearly 400,000 people tried to enter the U.S. through the section of the southwest border that includes Eagle Pass last fiscal year.
In the lower court's decision, U.S. District Judge David Ezra cast doubt on Texas' rationale for the barrier. He wrote at the time that the state produced no "credible evidence that the buoy barrier as installed has significantly curtailed illegal immigration."
Officials with U.S. Customs and Border Protection did not immediately comment.
- In:
- Texas
- Rio Grande
- Migrants
veryGood! (424)
Related
- California voters reject proposed ban on forced prison labor in any form
- How Russia's war in Ukraine is changing the world's oil markets
- Tesla factory produces Cybertruck nearly 4 years after Elon Musk unveiled it
- Ford slashes price of its F-150 Lightning electric pickup truck
- Mississippi Valley State football player Ryan Quinney dies in car accident
- Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $250 Crossbody Bag for Just $79
- Do you live in one of America's fittest cities? 2023's Top 10 ranking revealed.
- Shop J.Crew’s Extra 50% Off Sale and Get a $100 Skirt for $16, a $230 Pair of Heels for $28, and More
- 2 more escaped monkeys recaptured and enjoying peanut butter and jelly sandwiches in South Carolina
- Warming Trends: Cooling Off Urban Heat Islands, Surviving Climate Disasters and Tracking Where Your Social Media Comes From
Ranking
- New Orleans marks with parade the 64th anniversary of 4 little girls integrating city schools
- Inside Eminem and Hailie Jade Mathers' Private Father-Daughter Bond
- Citing an ‘Imminent’ Health Threat, the EPA Orders Temporary Shut Down of St. Croix Oil Refinery
- Fox Corp CEO praises Fox News leader as network faces $1.6 billion lawsuit
- Federal judge denies request to block measure revoking Arkansas casino license
- Florida’s Red Tides Are Getting Worse and May Be Hard to Control Because of Climate Change
- North Dakota, Using Taxpayer Funds, Bailed Out Oil and Gas Companies by Plugging Abandoned Wells
- Want to Elect Climate Champions? Here’s How to Tell Who’s Really Serious About Climate Change
Recommendation
-
What are the best financial advising companies? Help USA TODAY rank the top U.S. firms
-
A new movement is creating ways for low-income people to invest in real estate
-
Does Nature Have Rights? A Burgeoning Legal Movement Says Rivers, Forests and Wildlife Have Standing, Too
-
Do you live in one of America's fittest cities? 2023's Top 10 ranking revealed.
-
Will Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul end in KO? Boxers handle question differently
-
Distributor, newspapers drop 'Dilbert' comic strip after creator's racist rant
-
Kate Spade 24-Hour Flash Deal: Get This $250 Crossbody Bag for Just $79
-
Charges related to Trump's alleged attempt to overturn 2020 election in Georgia could come soon. Here are the details.