Current:Home > InvestCourt pauses federal policy allowing abortion clinic operators to get grants -- but only in Ohio-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Court pauses federal policy allowing abortion clinic operators to get grants -- but only in Ohio
View Date:2024-12-23 19:47:11
A federal appeals court has paused enforcement of a federal government regulation that allows abortion providers to receive federal family planning money — but only in Ohio, where state health officials said the policy took money away from them.
Since 1981, federal policy has changed several times regarding whether programs receiving family planning funds can provide abortions or refer patients to such services. Soon after President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the administration made rules to allow groups with abortion services to receive the funding again.
A dozen states with Republican attorneys general challenged the rule.
A U.S. District Court judge ruled last year that the Biden administration’s version of the rules could remain in effect while the challenge moves through the court system.
A majority of the three-judge panel from the Cincinnati-based 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overruled that in a decision Thursday — but only as it applies to how the federal government distributes the grants in Ohio.
The majority judges — Joan Larsen and Amul Thapar, both nominated by Republican former President Donald Trump — said that Ohio was the only state that demonstrated it had suffered irreparable harm from the policy. The state health department said it was receiving 20% less in federal family planning funding under the current policy that it did under the regulation that was in place previously.
The judges said that’s because when referrals were banned, Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio did not apply for funding. When the referrals were again allowed, the group, which also provides abortions, returned. And when that happened, the award to the state’s health department decreased by $1.8 million.
Ohio Attorney General Dave Yost said the result could be that the state’s Planned Parenthood affiliate might need to make changes or risk losing funding.
A third judge, Karen Nelson Moore, who was nominated by former Democratic President Bill Clinton, dissented, saying her colleagues misunderstand the regulations.
The bigger case remains in the court system.
The abortion landscape has changed drastically since the lawsuit was initially filed. Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned its landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that established a nationwide right to abortion.
Since then, most Republican-controlled states, including most of those challenging the Biden administration policy, have enacted bans or strict limits.
Ohio adopted a ban on abortion after cardiac activity can be detected, about six weeks into pregnancy, which is often before women know they’re pregnant. But a court blocked enforcement, and voters last month adopted an amendment to the state constitution enshrining the right to abortion.
veryGood! (8)
Related
- Ryan Reynolds Clarifies Taylor Swift’s Role as Godmother to His Kids With Blake Lively
- Following the U.S., Australia says it will remove Chinese-made surveillance cameras
- Can Rights of Nature Laws Make a Difference? In Ecuador, They Already Are
- Will a Recent Emergency Methane Release Be the Third Strike for Weymouth’s New Natural Gas Compressor?
- Pennsylvania House Republicans pick new floor leader after failing to regain majority
- Six Takeaways About Tropical Cyclones and Hurricanes From The New IPCC Report
- Tish Cyrus Celebrates Her Tishelorette in Italy After Dominic Purcell Engagement
- A jury clears Elon Musk of wrongdoing related to 2018 Tesla tweets
- Stock market today: Asian shares meander, tracking Wall Street’s mixed finish as dollar surges
- This Jennifer Aniston Editing Error From a 2003 Friends Episode Will Have You Doing a Double Take
Ranking
- American Idol’s Triston Harper, 16, Expecting a Baby With Wife Paris Reed
- Gunman who killed 11 people at Pittsburgh synagogue is found eligible for death penalty
- Maryland Thought Deregulating Utilities Would Lower Rates. It’s Cost the State’s Residents Hundreds of Millions of Dollars.
- Migration could prevent a looming population crisis. But there are catches
- 1 million migrants in the US rely on temporary protections that Trump could target
- Eggs prices drop, but the threat from avian flu isn't over yet
- A silent hazard is sinking buildings in Chicago and other major cities – and it will only get worse
- TikTok officials go on a public charm offensive amid a stalemate in Biden White House
Recommendation
-
Drone footage captures scope of damage, destruction from deadly Louisville explosion
-
Exxon Pledges to Reduce Emissions, but the Details Suggest Nothing Has Changed
-
The EPA Calls an Old Creosote Works in Pensacola an Uncontrolled Threat to Human Health. Why Is There No Money to Clean it Up?
-
FDA approves first over-the-counter birth control pill, Opill
-
US Election Darkens the Door of COP29 as It Opens in Azerbaijan
-
Junk food companies say they're trying to do good. A new book raises doubts
-
Shell reports record profits as energy prices soar after Russia's invasion of Ukraine
-
Warming Trends: Katharine Hayhoe Talks About Hope, Potty Training Cows, and Can Woolly Mammoths Really Fight Climate Change?