Current:Home > NewsHere's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Here's how each Supreme Court justice voted to decide the affirmative action cases
View Date:2024-12-23 15:17:37
The Supreme Court decided 6-3 and 6-2 that race-conscious admission policies of the University of North Carolina and Harvard College violate the Constitution, effectively bringing to an end to affirmative action in higher education through a decision that will reverberate across campuses nationwide.
The rulings fell along ideological lines. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion for both cases, and Justice Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh wrote concurring opinions. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote a dissenting opinion. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson has ties to Harvard and recused herself in that case, but wrote a dissent in the North Carolina case.
The ruling is the latest from the Supreme Court's conservative majority that has upended decades of precedent, including overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022.
- Read the full text of the decision
Here's how the justices split on the affirmative action cases:
Supreme Court justices who voted against affirmative action
The court's six conservatives formed the majority in each cases. Roberts' opinion was joined by Thomas, Samuel Alito, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett. The chief justice wrote that Harvard and UNC's race-based admission guidelines "cannot be reconciled with the guarantees of the Equal Protection Clause."
"Respondents' race-based admissions systems also fail to comply with the Equal Protection Clause's twin commands that race may never be used as a 'negative' and that it may not operate as a stereotype," Roberts wrote. "The First Circuit found that Harvard's consideration of race has resulted in fewer admissions of Asian-American students. Respondents' assertion that race is never a negative factor in their admissions programs cannot withstand scrutiny. College admissions are zerosum, and a benefit provided to some applicants but not to others necessarily advantages the former at the expense of the latter. "
Roberts said that prospective students should be evaluated "as an individual — not on the basis of race," although universities can still consider "an applicant's discussion of how race affected his or her life, be it through discrimination, inspiration, or otherwise."
Supreme Court justices who voted to uphold affirmative action
The court's three liberals all opposed the majority's decision to reject race as a factor in college admissions. Sotomayor's dissent was joined by Justice Elena Kagan in both cases, and by Jackson in the UNC case. Both Sotomayor and Kagan signed onto Jackson's dissent as well.
Sotomayor argued that the admissions processes are lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
"The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment enshrines a guarantee of racial equality," Sotomayor wrote. "The Court long ago concluded that this guarantee can be enforced through race-conscious means in a society that is not, and has never been, colorblind."
In her dissent in the North Carolina case, Jackson recounted the long history of discrimination in the U.S. and took aim at the majority's ruling.
"With let-them-eat-cake obliviousness, today, the majority pulls the ripcord and announces 'colorblindness for all' by legal fiat," Jackson wrote. "But deeming race irrelevant in law does not make it so in life."
Melissa Quinn contributed to this report.
- In:
- Affirmative Action
- Supreme Court of the United States
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Police cruiser strikes and kills a bicyclist pulling a trailer in Vermont
- Horoscopes Today, December 19, 2023
- American consumers are feeling much more confident as holiday shopping season peaks
- Florida man threw 16-year-old dog in dumpster after pet's owners died, police say
- Tom Brady Admits He Screwed Up as a Dad to Kids With Bridget Moynahan and Gisele Bündchen
- Sydney Sweeney reveals she bought back the home her mom, grandma were born in
- Helicopter for Action News 6 crashes in New Jersey; pilot, photographer killed
- Neighbors describe frantic effort to enter burning Arizona home where 5 kids died: Screaming at the tops of our lungs
- US Diplomats Notch a Win on Climate Super Pollutants With Help From the Private Sector
- Ireland to launch a legal challenge against the UK government over Troubles amnesty bill
Ranking
- Travis Kelce's and Patrick Mahomes' Kansas City Houses Burglarized
- American consumers are feeling much more confident as holiday shopping season peaks
- The poinsettia by any other name? Try ‘cuetlaxochitl’ or ‘Nochebuena’
- News helicopter crashes in New Jersey, killing pilot and photographer, TV station says
- New Jersey will issue a drought warning after driest October ever and as wildfires rage
- American consumers are feeling much more confident as holiday shopping season peaks
- UK inflation falls by more than anticipated to 2-year low of 3.9% in November
- Lawsuit alleges Wisconsin Bar Association minority program is unconstitutional
Recommendation
-
Question of a lifetime: Families prepare to confront 9/11 masterminds
-
Ireland to launch a legal challenge against the UK government over Troubles amnesty bill
-
Italian prosecutor acknowledges stalking threat against murdered woman may have been underestimated
-
Israel’s top diplomat wants to fast-track humanitarian aid to Gaza via maritime corridor from Cyprus
-
Georgia's humbling loss to Mississippi leads college football winners and losers for Week 11
-
A Rwandan doctor gets 24-year prison sentence in France for his role in the 1994 genocide
-
Missouri Supreme Court strikes down law against homelessness, COVID vaccine mandates
-
Swiss upper house seeks to ban display of racist, extremist symbols that incite hatred and violence