Current:Home > MyNorth Carolina appeals court says bars’ challenges of governor’s COVID-19 restrictions can continue-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
North Carolina appeals court says bars’ challenges of governor’s COVID-19 restrictions can continue
View Date:2024-12-23 19:06:19
RALEIGH. N.C. (AP) — Portions of a lawsuit filed by several North Carolina bars and their operators seeking financial damages from the state over COVID-19 restrictions that shuttered doors and curtailed business can continue forward, an appeals court panel has ruled.
In a 2-1 decision, the state Court of Appeals decided on Tuesday that two causes of action stated by the bar owners can’t be halted under a legal doctrine that exempts state government from most lawsuits. The ruling upholds a trial judge’s order from last year regarding the restrictions first issued by Gov. Roy Cooper early in the pandemic.
The concept of sovereign immunity doesn’t prohibit the bar operators’ claims that Cooper’s executive orders violated their rights within the state constitution to “the enjoyment of the fruits of their own labor” and to substantive due process, Court of Appeals Judge April Wood wrote in the majority opinion.
In an attempt to ease the spread of coronavirus, the Democratic governor issued a series of executive orders that closed bars starting in March 2020. By that summer, bars still had to remain closed, but restaurants and breweries could serve alcohol during certain hours. The plaintiffs said there was no rational basis to treat restaurants and bars differently.
Later in 2020, bars could serve alcoholic drinks in outdoor seating, with time limits later added, which had “the practical effect of making bars unprofitable to operate,” the plaintiffs’ original lawsuit read. All temporary restrictions on bars were lifted in May 2021.
Lawyers for Cooper and the state said the restrictions on bars were based on the most current scientific studies and public health data available at the time. They showed that the virus could quickly spread among people assembled for long periods of time talking loudly or singing, “especially in environments where alcohol acts as a “disinhibitor,” according to a state legal brief.
Wood wrote that the validity of state laws being contested or the merits of the bar owners’ arguments weren’t being considered. But it’s clear that the plaintiffs have “a fundamental right” under the state constitution “to earn a living from the operation of their respective bar businesses,” and its potential violation should be considered in court, she added. Court of Appeals Judge Fred Gore joined Wood’s opinion.
Writing a dissenting opinion, Judge John Arrowood said that the majority got it wrong by not examining whether there was a rational basis for Cooper to issue orders through the state of emergency statute, thus making them valid. Issuing orders to combat the virus spread and protect the public’s health and safety was rationally related to a legitimate government purpose, he added.
“Curtailing the ability of our Governor to issue executive orders during a state of emergency sets a deadly precedent that will prove to have grave consequences in the future,” Arrowood wrote. The split decision raises the likelihood that the state Supreme Court will ultimately rule in the case.
Other claims in the lawsuit that the bar owners have filed either were dismissed or remain pending before panels of trial judges considering the constitutionality of state emergency management laws.
House Speaker Tim Moore and Senate leader Phil Berger are now listed as lawsuit defendants but didn’t actively participate in this specific appeal because of the issues addressed. The Republican-controlled legislature passed laws that attempted to curb Cooper’s COVID-19 business restrictions.
veryGood! (45219)
Related
- California voters reject proposed ban on forced prison labor in any form
- As US colleges raise the stakes for protests, activists are weighing new strategies
- Notre Dame upset by NIU: Instant reactions to historic Northern Illinois win
- US higher education advocates welcome federal support for Hispanic-serving institutions
- Louisville officials mourn victims of 'unthinkable' plant explosion amid investigation
- Grand Canyon’s main water line has broken dozens of times. Why is it getting a major fix only now?
- Gordon Ramsay's wife, Tana, reveals PCOS diagnosis. What is that?
- Week 2 college football predictions: Expert picks for Michigan-Texas and every Top 25 game
- Vermont man is fit to stand trial over shooting of 3 Palestinian college students
- Jason Kelce's Wife Kylie Kelce Reveals Her NFL Game Day Superstitions
Ranking
- Joan says 'Yes!' to 'Golden Bachelorette' finale fantasy beach proposal. Who did she pick?
- A Colorado State Patrol trooper is shot while parked along a highway and kills gunman
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Mountainsides
- Recreational marijuana sales begin on North Carolina tribal land, drug illegal in state otherwise
- Amazon Prime Video to stream Diamond Sports' regional networks
- Joy in Mud Bowl: Football tournament celebrates 50 years of messy fun
- Who are Sunday's NFL starting quarterbacks? Caleb Williams, Jayden Daniels to make debut
- When is US Open women's final? How to watch Jessica Pegula vs Aryna Sabalenka
Recommendation
-
IAT Community Introduce
-
A 14-year-old boy is charged with killing 4 people at his Georgia high school. Here’s what we know
-
Who is the highest-paid NFL player? Ranking the highest NFL contracts for 2024 season
-
The AI industry uses a light lobbying touch to educate Congress from a corporate perspective
-
Eminem, Alanis Morissette, Sheryl Crow, N.W.A. and Janet Jackson get Songwriters Hall of Fame nods
-
Nashville’s Mother Church of Country Music retains its roots as religious house of worship
-
Can Falcons rise up to meet lofty expectations for fortified roster?
-
Mother of Georgia shooting suspect said she called school before attack, report says