Current:Home > StocksAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View Date:2024-12-23 16:09:00
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (4)
Related
- Fantasy football waiver wire: 10 players to add for NFL Week 11
- Probe: Doomed Philadelphia news helicopter hit trees fast, broke up, then burned, killing 2 on board
- 28 years after Idaho woman's brutal murder, DNA on clasp of underwear points to her former neighbor as the killer
- Nike will lay off workers as part of $2-billion cost-cutting plan
- California farmers enjoy pistachio boom, with much of it headed to China
- The war took away their limbs. Now bionic prostheses empower wounded Ukrainian soldiers
- Temu accuses Shein of mafia-style intimidation in antitrust lawsuit
- 'Ultimate dream' is marriage. But pope's approval of blessings for LGBTQ couples is a start
- Insurance magnate pleads guilty as government describes $2B scheme
- TikToker Allison Kuch Gives Birth, Welcomes First Baby With NFL Star Issac Rochell
Ranking
- Cameron Brink set to make Sports Illustrated Swimsuit debut
- THINGS TO KNOW: Deadline looms for new map in embattled North Dakota redistricting lawsuit
- As the Israel-Hamas war rages, medical mercy flights give some of Gaza's most vulnerable a chance at survival
- Colorado Supreme Court justices getting violent threats after their ruling against Trump, report says
- Inspector general finds no fault in Park Police shooting of Virginia man in 2017
- Oscars shortlist includes 'I'm Just Ken,' 'Oppenheimer.' See what else made the cut.
- Humans could have arrived in North America 10,000 years earlier, new research shows
- Vin Diesel accused of sexual battery by former assistant in lawsuit
Recommendation
-
The Daily Money: Inflation is still a thing
-
Dispute over criminal jurisdiction flares in Oklahoma between tribal police, jailers
-
AP Week in Pictures: Global | Dec.15-Dec.21, 2023
-
A British sea monitoring agency says another vessel has been hijacked near Somalia
-
Deion Sanders addresses trash thrown at team during Colorado's big win at Texas Tech
-
Supreme Court won’t fast-track ruling on whether Trump can be prosecuted in election subversion case
-
Kim Kardashian Reveals Why She Used SKIMS Fabric to Wrap Her Christmas Presents
-
Despite backlash, Masha Gessen says comparing Gaza to a Nazi-era ghetto is necessary