Current:Home > NewsGoogle begins its defense in antitrust case alleging monopoly over advertising technology-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Google begins its defense in antitrust case alleging monopoly over advertising technology
View Date:2024-12-23 16:54:29
ALEXANDRIA, Va. (AP) — Google opened its defense against allegations that it holds an illegal monopoly on online advertising technology Friday with witness testimony saying the industry is vastly more complex and competitive than portrayed by the federal government.
“The industry has been exceptionally fluid over the last 18 years,” said Scott Sheffer, a vice president for global partnerships at Google, the company’s first witness at its antitrust trial in federal court in Alexandria.
The Justice Department and a coalition of states contend that Google built and maintained an illegal monopoly over the technology that facilitates the buying and selling of online ads seen by consumers.
Google counters that the government’s case improperly focuses on a narrow type of online ads — essentially the rectangular ones that appear on the top and on the right-hand side of a webpage. In its opening statement, Google’s lawyers said the Supreme Court has warned judges against taking action when dealing with rapidly emerging technology like what Sheffer described because of the risk of error or unintended consequences.
Google says defining the market so narrowly ignores the competition it faces from social media companies, Amazon, streaming TV providers and others who offer advertisers the means to reach online consumers.
Justice Department lawyers called witnesses to testify for two weeks before resting their case Friday afternoon, detailing the ways that automated ad exchanges conduct auctions in a matter of milliseconds to determine which ads are placed in front of which consumers and how much they cost.
The department contends the auctions are finessed in subtle ways that benefit Google to the exclusion of would-be competitors and in ways that prevent publishers from making as much money as they otherwise could for selling their ad space.
It also says that Google’s technology, when used on all facets of an ad transaction, allows Google to keep 36 cents on the dollar of any particular ad purchase, billions of which occur every single day.
Executives at media companies like Gannett, which publishes USA Today, and News Corp., which owns the Wall Streel Journal and Fox News, have said that Google dominates the landscape with technology used by publishers to sell ad space as well as by advertisers looking to buy it. The products are tied together so publishers have to use Google’s technology if they want easy access to its large cache of advertisers.
The government said in its complaint filed last year that at a minimum Google should be forced to sell off the portion of its business that caters to publishers, to break up its dominance.
In his testimony Friday, Sheffer explained how Google’s tools have evolved over the years and how it vetted publishers and advertisers to guard against issues like malware and fraud.
The trial began Sept. 9, just a month after a judge in the District of Columbia declared Google’s core business, its ubiquitous search engine, an illegal monopoly. That trial is still ongoing to determine what remedies, if any, the judge may impose.
The ad technology at question in the Virginia case does not generate the same kind of revenue for Goggle as its search engine does, but is still believed to bring in tens of billions of dollars annually.
Overseas, regulators have also accused Google of anticompetitive conduct. But the company won a victory this week when a an EU court overturned a 1.49 billion euro ($1.66 billion) antitrust fine imposed five years ago that targeted a different segment of the company’s online advertising business.
veryGood! (1598)
Related
- Tech consultant testifies that ‘bad joke’ led to deadly clash with Cash App founder Bob Lee
- In Louisiana, Climate Change Threatens the Preservation of History
- Amazon Prime Day 2023 Last Call Deals: Vital Proteins, Ring Doorbell, Bose, COSRX, iRobot, Olaplex & More
- Texas Gov. Greg Abbott defies Biden administration threat to sue over floating border barriers
- 'Yellowstone' premiere: Record ratings, Rip's ride and Billy Klapper's tribute
- Minnesota Has Passed a Landmark Clean Energy Law. Which State Is Next?
- The Botched Docs Face an Amputation and More Shocking Cases in Grisly Season 8 Trailer
- Loose lion that triggered alarm near Berlin was likely a boar, officials say
- 4 arrested in California car insurance scam: 'Clearly a human in a bear suit'
- Margot Robbie Just Put a Red-Hot Twist on Her Barbie Style
Ranking
- Judith Jamison, a dancer both eloquent and elegant, led Ailey troupe to success over two decades
- These 14 Prime Day Teeth Whitening Deals Will Make You Smile Nonstop
- The Red Sea Could be a Climate Refuge for Coral Reefs
- Jamie Foxx addresses hospitalization for the first time: I went to hell and back
- RHOBH's Erika Jayne Reveals Which Team She's on Amid Kyle Richards, Dorit Kemsley Feud
- Cocaine sharks may be exposed to drugs in the Florida Keys, researchers say
- Director Marcos Colón Takes an Intimate Look at Three Indigenous Leaders’ Fight to Preserve Their Ancestral Connection to Nature in the Amazon
- Prince William and Kate Middleton's 3 Kids Steal the Show During Surprise Visit to Air Show
Recommendation
-
Auburn surges, while Kansas remains No. 1 in the USA TODAY Sports men's basketball poll
-
What Lego—Yes, Lego—Can Teach Us About Avoiding Energy Project Boondoggles
-
Musk reveals Twitter ad revenue is down 50% as social media competition mounts
-
Amid Glimmers of Bipartisan Interest, Advocates Press Congress to Add Nuclear Power to the Climate Equation
-
Trump pledged to roll back protections for transgender students. They’re flooding crisis hotlines
-
A ‘Rights of Nature’ Fact-Finding Panel to Investigate Mexico’s Tren Maya Railroad for Possible Environmental Violations
-
Chipotle testing a robot, dubbed Autocado, that makes guacamole
-
New Wind and Solar Are Cheaper Than the Costs to Operate All But One Coal-Fired Power Plant in the United States