Current:Home > Contact-usSupreme Court rules public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking critics on social media-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Supreme Court rules public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking critics on social media
View Date:2024-12-23 14:09:28
WASHINGTON (AP) — A unanimous Supreme Court ruled Friday that public officials can sometimes be sued for blocking their critics on social media, an issue that first arose for the high court in a case involving then-President Donald Trump.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the court, said that officials who use personal accounts to make official statements may not be free to delete comments about those statements or block critics altogether.
On the other hand, Barrett wrote, “State officials have private lives and their own constitutional rights.”
The court ruled in two cases involving lawsuits filed by people who were blocked after leaving critical comments on social media accounts belonging to school board members in Southern California and a city manager in Port Huron, Michigan, northeast of Detroit. They are similar to a case involving Trump and his decision to block critics from his personal account on Twitter, now known as X. The justices dismissed the case after Trump left office in January 2021.
The cases forced the court to deal with the competing free speech rights of public officials and their constituents, all in a rapidly evolving virtual world. They are among five social media cases on the court’s docket this term.
Appeals courts in San Francisco and Cincinnati had reached conflicting decisions about when personal accounts become official, and the high court did not embrace either ruling, returning the cases to the appeals courts to apply the standard the justices laid out Friday.
“When a government official posts about job-related topics on social media, it can be difficult to tell whether the speech is official or private,” Barrett said.
Officials must have the authority to speak on behalf of their governments and intend to use it for their posts to be regarded essentially as the government’s, Barrett wrote. In such cases, they have to allow criticism, or risk being sued, she wrote.
In one case, James Freed, who was appointed the Port Huron city manager in 2014, used the Facebook page he first created while in college to communicate with the public, as well as recount the details of daily life.
In 2020, a resident, Kevin Lindke, used the page to comment several times from three Facebook profiles, including criticism of the city’s response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Freed blocked all three accounts and deleted Lindke’s comments. Lindke sued, but the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals sided with Freed, noting that his Facebook page talked about his roles as “father, husband, and city manager.”
The other case involved two elected members of a California school board, the Poway Unified School District Board of Trustees. The members, Michelle O’Connor-Ratcliff and T.J. Zane, used their personal Facebook and Twitter accounts to communicate with the public. Two parents, Christopher and Kimberly Garnier, left critical comments and replies to posts on the board members’ accounts and were blocked. The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the board members had violated the parents’ free speech rights by doing so. Zane no longer serves on the school board.
The court’s other social media cases have a more partisan flavor. The justices are evaluating Republican-passed laws in Florida and Texas that prohibit large social media companies from taking down posts because of the views they express. The tech companies said the laws violate their First Amendment rights. The laws reflect a view among Republicans that the platforms disproportionately censor conservative viewpoints.
Next week, the court is hearing a challenge from Missouri and Louisiana to the Biden administration’s efforts to combat controversial social media posts on topics including COVID-19 and election security. The states argue that the Democratic administration has been unconstitutionally coercing the platforms into cracking down on conservative positions.
The cases decided Friday are O’Connor-Ratcliff v. Garnier, 22-324, and Lindke v. Freed, 22-611.
veryGood! (253)
Related
- Stock market today: Asian shares mostly decline, shrugging off Wall Street’s overnight rally
- Kevin Harvick becomes full-time TV analyst, reveals he wants to be 'John Madden of NASCAR'
- Explosion at Virginia home kills 1 firefighter and hospitalizes 9 firefighters and 2 civilians
- Horoscopes Today, February 16, 2024
- Advocacy group sues Tennessee over racial requirements for medical boards
- Trump hawks $399 branded shoes at ‘Sneaker Con,’ a day after a $355 million ruling against him
- Albuquerque Police Department opens internal investigation into embattled DWI unit
- Officer shot and suspect critically wounded in exchange of gunfire in Pennsylvania, authorities say
- Bowl projections: SEC teams joins College Football Playoff field
- Former NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre is on trial for alleged corruption. Here's what to know as the civil trial heads to a jury.
Ranking
- NCT DREAM enters the 'DREAMSCAPE': Members on new album, its concept and songwriting
- Customs and Border Protection's top doctor tried to order fentanyl lollipops for helicopter trip to U.N., whistleblowers say
- Manchin announces he won't run for president
- Daytona 500 2024: Start time, TV, live stream, lineup, key info for NASCAR season opener
- MVSU football player killed, driver injured in crash after police chase
- Fear of God Athletics reveals first foray into college basketball with Indiana and Miami
- Tesla Cybertruck owners complain their new vehicles are rusting
- Thousands of fans 'Taylor-gate' outside of Melbourne stadium
Recommendation
-
Nearly 80,000 pounds of Costco butter recalled for missing 'Contains Milk statement': FDA
-
California is forging ahead with food waste recycling. But is it too much, too fast?
-
Here’s a look inside Donald Trump’s $355 million civil fraud verdict as an appeals fight looms
-
Daytona 500 2024: Start time, TV, live stream, lineup, key info for NASCAR season opener
-
2025 NFL Draft order: Updated first round picks after Week 10 games
-
'We can’t do anything': How Catholic hospitals constrain medical care in America.
-
Boy who was staying at Chicago migrant shelter died of sepsis, autopsy says
-
Don’t Miss Kate Spade Outlet’s Presidents’ Day Sale Featuring Bags Up to 90% Off, Just in Time for Spring