Current:Home > BackWisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal-Angel Dreamer Wealth Society D1 Reviews & Insights
Wisconsin judge rules that absentee voting van used in 2022 was illegal
View Date:2025-01-11 05:26:39
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — A Wisconsin judge ruled Monday that state law does not allow the use of mobile absentee voting sites, siding with Republicans who had challenged the city of Racine’s use of a voting van that traveled around the city in 2022.
Republicans opposed the use of the van, the only one of its kind in Wisconsin, saying its use was against the law, increased the chances of voter fraud and was used to bolster Democratic turnout.
Racine officials, the Democratic National Committee and the Milwaukee-based voting advocacy group Black Leaders Organizing for Communities refuted those claims and defended the legality of the van, saying there was no specific prohibition against it.
The lawsuit over the mobile voting van is one of several in battleground Wisconsin that could affect voting rules in the upcoming presidential election.
The van was first used in Racine’s municipal elections in 2022. It was purchased with grant money Racine received from the Center for Tech and Civic Life, the nonprofit created by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg and his wife. Republicans have been critical of the grants, calling the money “Zuckerbucks” that they say was used to tilt turnout in Democratic areas.
The van was used only to facilitate early in-person voting during the two weeks prior to an election, Racine City Clerk Tara McMenamin said. She said the vehicle was useful because it was becoming too cumbersome for her staff to set up their equipment in remote polling sites.
It traveled across the city to meet voters in their neighborhoods and collect early ballots.
The Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, on behalf of Racine County Republican Party Chairman Ken Brown, filed a complaint the day after the August 2022 primary with the Wisconsin Elections Commission, arguing that the van was against state law. They argued that it was only sent to Democratic areas in the city in an illegal move to bolster turnout.
McMenamin disputed those accusations, saying that it shows a misunderstanding of the city’s voting wards, which traditionally lean Democratic.
The elections commission dismissed the complaint four days before the November election that year, saying that there was no probable cause shown to believe the law had been broken. That led the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty to then file its lawsuit.
Racine County Circuit Judge Eugene Gasiorkiewicz, in a ruling late Monday, overturned the elections commission’s dismissal of the complaint, saying state election laws do not allow for the use of mobile voting sites.
“Nowhere can this Court find or has been provided any authority allowing the use of a van or vehicle as an alternate absentee voting vehicle,” the judge wrote.
He rejected the argument from defendants that the use of mobile voting sites was allowable because there is no specific prohibition against them.
The judge said his ruling wasn’t a determination on whether mobile voting sites were a good idea or not. That is up to the Legislature to decide, Gasiorkiewicz said.
The Wisconsin Elections Commission and the state Department of Justice, which represented it in the lawsuit, did not return messages seeking comment on whether the decision will be appealed. McMenamin was in a meeting Tuesday and did not return a message seeking comment.
Early in-person absentee voting in Wisconsin for the municipal spring election begins Feb. 6. The presidential primary is April 2, with absentee voting allowed two weeks before it.
If appealed, the case could ultimately be decided by Wisconsin’s liberal-controlled state Supreme Court.
Lucas Vebber, deputy counsel at the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, hailed the ruling.
“Wisconsin voters should know that their elections are secure, and that election administration does not favor one political party over another,” Vebber said. “This decision does just that.”
veryGood! (216)
Related
- Veterans Day restaurant deals 2024: More than 80 discounts, including free meals
- How the Bud Light boycott shows brands at a crossroads: Use their voice, or shut up?
- Google shows you ads for anti-abortion centers when you search for clinics near you
- Inside Clean Energy: Solid-State Batteries for EVs Make a Leap Toward Mass Production
- Outgoing North Carolina governor grants 2 pardons, 6 commutations
- Experts raised safety concerns about OceanGate years before its Titanic sub vanished
- Traveling over the Fourth of July weekend? So is everyone else
- Wildfires Are Burning State Budgets
- Surprise bids revive hope for offshore wind in Gulf of Mexico after feds cancel lease sale
- Dua Lipa Fantastically Frees the Nipple at Barbie Premiere
Ranking
- Elena Rose has made hits for JLo, Becky G and more. Now she's stepping into the spotlight.
- Google shows you ads for anti-abortion centers when you search for clinics near you
- Biden kept Trump's tariffs on Chinese imports. This is who pays the price
- Who Were the Worst Climate Polluters in the US in 2021?
- New Jersey will issue a drought warning after driest October ever and as wildfires rage
- Planet Money Live: Two Truths and a Lie
- Biden kept Trump's tariffs on Chinese imports. This is who pays the price
- A New Shell Plant in Pennsylvania Will Soon Become the State’s Second Largest Emitter of Volatile Organic Chemicals
Recommendation
-
Olympic Skier Lindsey Vonn Coming Out of Retirement at 40
-
Watch Carlee Russell press conference's: Police give update on missing Alabama woman
-
Amid the Devastation of Hurricane Ian, a New Study Charts Alarming Flood Risks for U.S. Hospitals
-
Untangling All the Controversy Surrounding Colleen Ballinger
-
RHOBH's Kyle Richards Addresses PK Kemsley Cheating Rumors in the Best Way Possible
-
Harry Styles Reacts to Tennis Star Elina Monfils Giving Up Concert Tickets Amid Wimbledon Run
-
The Supreme Court rules against USPS in Sunday work case
-
New Jersey Joins Other States in Suing Fossil Fuel Industry, Claiming Links to Climate Change